| Name |
Code |
Class |
Buyable |
Mineable |
Harvestable |
Supply Locations |
Max Inventory SCU |
Box Size |
Cost / SCU |
Price / SCU |
Profit / SCU |
Demand Locations |
Profit Margin [%] |
Profit % |
| Bexalite |
BEXA |
secondary |
x |
|
|
1 |
180 |
8 |
0,006 |
0,007 |
0,001 |
3 |
26,26 |
35,61 |
For Shepard’s Trade Run we found 1 Supply Location(s) for the lowest cost/SCU of 0,006k and 2 Demand Location(s) where 0,007k is the highest selling price.
| Code |
Class |
Max Inventory SCU |
Box Size |
Cost / SCU [kaUEC] |
Invest / Inventory |
Price / SCU [kaUEC] |
Out of Stock |
Revenue / Inventory |
Profit / Go |
| BEXA |
secondary |
180 |
8 |
0,006 |
966,06 |
0,007 |
180 |
1291,86 |
325,8 |
For Shepard’s Mass Trade Run we found 1 Supply Location(s) for the lowest cost/SCU of 0,006k and 2 Demand Location(s) where 0,007k is the highest selling price.
| Code |
Class |
Max Inventory SCU |
Box Size |
Cost / SCU [kaUEC] |
Invest / Inventory |
Price / SCU [kaUEC] |
Out of Stock |
Revenue / Inventory |
Profit / Go |
| BEXA |
secondary |
180 |
8 |
0,006 |
966,06 |
0,007 |
180 |
1291,86 |
325,8 |
The Dilemma of Shepard’s Trade Run (BEXA) is the 1 Supply Location(s) ‘###’ is under the control of ‘###’ where 2 Demand Location(s) are under the control of ‘###’. In order to … .
| Supply Locations |
Max Inventory [SCU] |
max. Box Size [SCU] |
Cost / SCU |
Invest / Inventory |
Price / SCU |
Out of Stock [SCU] |
Demand Locations |
Revenue / Inventory |
Profit / SCU |
Profit / Go |
Profit / Run |
Profit Margin [%] / SCU |
Profit % / SCU |
| 1 180 8 ‘5,367 ‘966,060 ‘7,278 120 3 ‘873,360 ‘1,911 ‘343,980 ‘229,320 1:1 26,26 35,61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 180 8 ‘5,367 ‘966,060 ‘7,177 180 2 1'291,860 ‘1,810 ‘325,800 ‘325,800 1:1 25,22 33,72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 180 8 ‘5,367 ‘966,060 ‘7,177 180 2 1'291,860 ‘1,810 ‘325,800 ‘325,800 1:1 25,22 33,72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|